الكاتب: kafej

Three Israeli hostages mistakenly killed by the IDF had been holding a white flag, an Israeli military official has said.

The official said an initial inquiry into the incident has found the hostages were fired upon against Israel’s rules of engagement.

Israel-Gaza latest: Follow live

The IDF said yesterday that the victims – all Israeli men in their 20s – were killed during combat with Hamas militants.

They had wrongly been identified as a threat, the military said previously.

The victims were identified as Samer al Talalka, 22, Yotam Haim, 28, and Alon Shamriz, 26.

Sharing further updates, the IDF official said the hostages were killed in an area of intense combat where Hamas militants operate in civilian attire and use deception tactics.

A soldier saw the hostages emerging tens of metres from Israeli forces in the area of Shejaiya, he added.

“They’re all without shirts and they have a stick with a white cloth on it. The soldier feels threatened and opens fire. He declares that they’re terrorists, they [forces] open fire, two are killed immediately,” the military official stated.

The third hostage was wounded and retreated into a nearby building where he called for help in Hebrew, the official said.

“Immediately the battalion commander issues a ceasefire order, but again there’s another burst of fire towards the third
figure and he also dies,” said the official. “This was against our rules of engagement,” he added.

Hundreds of protesters filled the streets of Tel Aviv last night after the IDF first announced the deaths.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the incident an “unbearable tragedy” and vowed to continue “with a supreme effort to return all the hostages home safely”.

“Together with the entire people of Israel, I bow my head in deep sorrow and mourn the death of three of our dear sons who were kidnapped,” Mr Netanyahu said.

“My heart goes out to the grieving families in their difficult time.”

The three killed hostages were abducted by Hamas during their attack on 7 October which triggered the war. More than 100 hostages still remain captive, according to Israeli authorities.

‘We had so many hopes he would come back to us’

A relative of one of the three hostages killed by the IDF said his family had “so many hopes” that he would return safely.

Alaa al Talalka, the cousin of Samer al Talalka, also told Israeli broadcaster Kan that now was “not the time” to seek someone to blame for his death.

“We’re not going to start pointing fingers, who is guilty and who is not. It is just not the time,” he said.

“The families are thinking only of how to bring the hostages back alive. This is the time to ask for the war to end.”

The Hostages and Missing Persons Families Forum, which represents the families of hostages, expressed its condolences and paid tribute to the victims.

It said that “Yotam was a gifted musician and dedicated metal music fan who idolised the band Megadeth” while “Samer was an avid motorcyclist who loved to ride around the countryside and spend time with friends”.

The forum added: “Alon’s family and friends described him as a lover of life and a dedicated basketball fan.”

Donald Trump has said undocumented immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” during a speech in New Hampshire.

The Republican presidential frontrunner repeated language that had previously been criticised as xenophobic and echoing Nazi rhetoric.

Mr Trump made the comments during a campaign event where he railed against the record number of migrants attempting to cross the US border illegally.

He has promised to crack down on illegal immigration and restrict legal immigration if elected to a second four-year term in office.

Read more:
A ‘very close’ US election is less than a year away: What will decide it?

“They’re poisoning the blood of our country,” he told a rally in the city of Durham attended by several thousand supporters.

He said immigrants were coming to the US from Asia and Africa in addition to South America, adding: “All over the world they are pouring into our country.”

He used the same “poisoning the blood” language during an interview with The National Pulse, a right-leaning website that was published in late September.

It prompted a rebuke from the Anti-Defamation League, whose leader, Jonathan Greenblatt, called the language “racist, xenophobic and despicable”.

Jason Stanley, a Yale professor and author of a book on fascism, said Mr Trump’s repeated use of that language was dangerous.

Read more::
Ivanka Trump gives evidence in father’s fraud trial
Biden ‘isn’t sure he’d be running if Trump weren’t in race’

He said the words echoed the rhetoric of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.

“He is now employing this vocabulary in repetition in rallies. Repeating dangerous speech increases its normalisation and the practices it recommends,” he said.

“This is very concerning talk for the safety of immigrants in the US.”

In October, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung had dismissed criticism of the former president’s language as “nonsensical”, arguing that similar language was prevalent in books, news articles and on TV.

The gulf between the US and the Israeli government visions for “the day after” in Gaza seems to be widening by the day.

In his Saturday news conference, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed, again, a two-state solution and insisted Israel will have enduring security control in Gaza.

In doing so, he undermined the alliance through which America is backing Israel’s military operation in Gaza.

The Biden administration has repeatedly defined its backing of Israel as being to support its right to self-defence by eradicating Hamas in order to establish a viable pathway to two states.

Follow latest: Three Israeli hostages killed mistakenly by IDF

Contradictions over ‘the day after’

America’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan has just left Israel where we are told he reiterated America’s desire for a Palestinian/Arab-led security structure in Gaza when the war is over, and for the establishment of a “two-state solution” soon thereafter.

Mr Sullivan talked of a Palestinian-led “nucleus” for the security question in Gaza and even discussed West Bank-based Palestinian units that could have a key role.

A senior US administration official said late on Thursday night after Sullivan’s meeting with Netanyahu: “There are a number of security personnel linked to the Palestinian Authority, which we think might be able to provide some sort of a nucleus in the many months following the overall military campaign, but this is something we are discussing with the Palestinians and with the Israelis, and with regional partners…”

The official also insisted repeatedly that President Biden’s view was that the only option for the future was a two-state solution with the establishment of a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank.

The US official, on a background call with journalists, described the US vision as “…the type of future that everybody wants to see which is a path, a pathway ultimately, to a viable, two-state solution in which Israel’s security is guaranteed and the aspirations of the Palestinian people can be met.”

And yet this weekend, not only has the Israeli Prime Minister brazenly lauded his own efforts to prevent a Palestinian State over the years, but he is insisting that Israel will have enduring security control over Gaza.

“Nobody else can ensure that there will be a peaceful regime,” Netanyahu said.

He is repeating messages his ministers and ambassadors have been issuing, rejecting the two-state solution. Netanyahu has often danced around the issue giving vague definitions of what it would look like.

The point now is this: at the very moment where alignment is required, and where it’s surely important for the messaging from the top of the Israeli government to match that at the top of the American government, Netanyahu is choosing instead to be provocatively contrary.

Indeed, this past week, I asked US State Department spokesman Matt Miller about the Israeli Ambassador to the UK’s rejection of the two-state solution.

His response suggested he thought she was an outlier and that there were a variety of views. Clearly that variety doesn’t stretch to the man running the war which America is fuelling.

New leaders

Ultimately American policy relies on an urgent change at the top of both the Israeli and the Palestinian leadership.

For Israel, the Americans want Netanyahu out. It’s telling that Sullivan saw opposition leader Benny Gantz for a lengthy meeting on Thursday.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Netanyahu will surely do all he can to hang on, largely to avoid a reckoning over the failures which led to the 7 October nightmare. He’d probably be glad to see his old pal Donald Trump back in the White House too. And so the master of political manoeuvring will try to hang on.

As for the Palestinians? Well, the Americans talk about a “revitalised Palestinian Authority” capable of running Gaza. What they actually mean by that is the retirement of aging and deeply unpopular Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. They want a younger and more visionary leader to replace him. But who, and how?

Read more:
David Cameron calls for lasting peace piling more pressure on Netanyahu
Israel’s objective is not limited to ‘solving the Hamas problem’ – analysis

A prize needed

The Israelis are likely to focus more on the “day after” in Gaza once they have demonstrated some strategic success on the battlefield. They have razed the strip and nearly 20,000 people are dead. But the Hamas leadership remains at large. Netanyahu needs a “prize” so he can wind back the brutal war.

But the longer the war drags on, the harder the “day after” will be to mould. With the shock and pain of the last 70 days, reconciliation and coexistence firmly feel more distant than ever for this region.

A fire that broke out at a hotel in Galway which was due to be used to house asylum seekers is being treated as a crime by police.

Irish police are investigating after a blaze broke out at Ross Lake House Hotel in Rosscahill, Co Galway, at around 11.35pm on Saturday.

No one was inside the building at the time, and the fire service brought the flames under control.

Gardai are treating the fire as a criminal damage incident and said the scene was set to be examined further on Sunday afternoon.

The hotel has not been in use for several years and had been selected to house 70 asylum seekers in the coming days.

The government’s plan had been heavily criticised by local opposition and protesters had blocked the hotel’s entrance earlier on Saturday.

Police are appealing for anyone who may have information regarding the fire to contact them.

Read more on Sky News:
Is immigration to Ireland ‘out of control’?
Footage shows tornado sweeping through Irish village

Figures from the CSO show that in the year leading up to April 2023, the number of immigrants to Ireland was more than 140,000 – a 16-year-high.

According to police, it was anti-immigration protesters who were involved in the huge riot in Dublin city centre last month after a stabbing attack left three young children and their carer were injured.

Police officers were attacked and vehicles were set alight as part of the riot.