{"id":89458,"date":"2024-01-10T02:58:05","date_gmt":"2024-01-10T02:58:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.estaql.com\/peregrine-mission-1-spacecraft-has-no-chance-of-landing-on-moon-company-says-science-tech-news\/"},"modified":"2024-01-10T02:58:05","modified_gmt":"2024-01-10T02:58:05","slug":"peregrine-mission-1-spacecraft-has-no-chance-of-landing-on-moon-company-says-science-tech-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/peregrine-mission-1-spacecraft-has-no-chance-of-landing-on-moon-company-says-science-tech-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News<\/h2>\n

Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

Astrobotic have given up on their Peregrine-1 spacecraft landing on the moon after it sprang a crippling propellant leak.<\/p>\n

The problem occurred in the first few hours of the lunar lander’s journey into space.<\/p>\n

The Pittsburgh-based firm – which had been hoping to be the first private company to complete a moon landing – said there was “no chance” of the spacecraft being able to survive the descent.<\/p>\n

“Given the propellant leak, there is, unfortunately, no chance of a soft landing on the moon,” Astrobotic said in a statement.<\/p>\n

However, the company said the lander has enough fuel left to allow it to operate “as a spacecraft” while engineers decide on its new mission in orbit.<\/p>\n

US space agency NASA<\/strong>, which paid $108m (\u00a385m) to send scientific instruments up with the lander, had hoped the craft would scope out an area of the moon ahead of its own planned landing next year.<\/p>\n

However, on Tuesday, following Astrobotic’s statement, NASA announced it had postponed landing astronauts on the moon until at least 2026.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>
\n Image:<\/span>
\n The Peregrine lunar lander. Pic: AP
\n <\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

What happened to Peregrine?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Peregrine Mission-1 took off in Florida on a new Vulcan rocket at 7.18am UK time on Monday and had been scheduled to land on 23 February.<\/p>\n

It was intended to be the first US spacecraft to land on the moon’s surface since Apollo 17 in 1972 and appeared to lift off into space as planned<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The problems with the Peregrine Mission-1 lander<\/strong> were reported around seven hours after Monday’s pre-dawn lift-off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.<\/p>\n

Astrobotic previously said Peregrine “successfully” separated from the rocket but an “anomaly” had occurred.<\/p>\n

The company said the propulsion system problem<\/strong> had “threatened the ability of the spacecraft to soft land on the moon”.<\/p>\n

Astrobotic said a photo from a lander-mounted camera, showed a “disturbance” in a section of thermal insulation – which aligned with what was so far known of the problem.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>
\n Image:<\/span>
\n A disturbed section of insulation on the Peregrine lander while on its way to land on the moon
\nPic:Astrobotic \/AP
\n <\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The company was aiming to be the first private business to successfully land on the moon, something only four countries have accomplished.<\/p>\n

A second lander from a Houston company is due to launch next month. NASA gave the two companies millions to build and fly their own lunar landers.<\/p>\n

The space agency wanted the privately owned landers to scope out the area before astronauts arrive while delivering tech and science experiments for the space agency, other countries and universities.<\/p>\n

Read more
Why the moon mission matters
Sports drink and human remains – is this moon mission compatible with science?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The $108m (\u00a385m) paid to Astrobotic, a space logistics start-up, was a fraction of the cost of launching one of NASA’s own missions.<\/p>\n

The lander, which is the size of a garden shed, is also carrying the remains of several Star Trek cast members and the DNA of former US presidents including John F Kennedy.<\/p>\n

NASA postpones its moon landing<\/strong><\/p>\n

The last time the US launched a moon landing mission was in December 1972. Apollo 17’s Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt became the 11th and 12th men to walk on the moon.<\/p>\n

NASA had been planning to return astronauts to the moon’s surface within the next few years under its Artemis programme.<\/p>\n

However, on Tuesday, the space agency pushed its crewed flight around the moon – Artemis 2 – to September 2025 because of technical issues.<\/p>\n

It was previously reported by the news agency Reuters, quoting two unnamed sources, that the mission was set to be pushed beyond its planned late-2024 target after issues were uncovered with the Lockheed Martin-built Orion crew capsule’s batteries during vibration tests.<\/p>\n

NASA also pushed its first human moon landing in 50 years – Artemis 3 – back to September 2026.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u062f\u0631<\/a>
\n
\n\u0623\u062e\u0628\u0627\u0631<\/a><\/p>\n

Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News Peregrine Mission-1 spacecraft has ‘no chance’ of landing on moon, company says | Science & Tech News Astrobotic have given up on their Peregrine-1 spacecraft landing on the moon after it sprang a crippling propellant leak. The problem […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7711],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-7711"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estaql.com\/seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}