الكاتب: kafej

At midnight ‘devices to prevent entry’ will go up at four of the border crossings between the European neighbours.

Finland will place barriers on four of the eight border crossings it shares with Russia, as it seeks to stem a flow of asylum seekers.

The Finnish Border Guard said on Friday that the barriers will go up at midnight (22:00 GMT) at the Vaalimaa, Nuijamaa, Imatra and Niirala crossings in southeastern Finland.

“Our aim is to use barrier devices to prevent entry,” the Border Guard’s head of international affairs Matti Pitkaniitty told reporters. The measures are a response to changes in Russia’s border policy, he said.

Helsinki has accused Moscow of encouraging or turning a blind eye to undocumented migrants crossing over. Russia has denied the claim.

Finland announced earlier this week that it would close the four border crossings, which are the busiest points of travel between the two countries, with about 3,000 people crossing per day.

Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said that amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Moscow was seeking to destabilise his country in response to Helsinki’s decision to join NATO.

Finland’s action was supported by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

“Russia’s instrumentalisation of migrants is shameful. I fully support the measures taken by Finland,” von der Leyen said on X.

I had a call with PM @PetteriOrpo who informed me about the situation at the border with Russia.

Russia’s instrumentalisation of migrants is shameful.

I fully support the measures taken by Finland.

And I thank the Finnish Border Guards for protecting our European borders.

— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) November 16, 2023

Finland’s neighbour Norway, which shares a border with Russia in the Arctic, has said it is also ready to close its border at short notice if necessary.

From Saturday, asylum seekers arriving via Russia will only be allowed to hand in their applications at two northern border crossings, at Salla and Vartius, Pitkaniitty said.

The border closures come amid growing tension between Russia and Finland over Helsinki’s military alliances since Russia’s war with Ukraine began.

Finland shares a 1,340km (833-mile) frontier with Russia that also serves as the European Union’s external border.

After Russia invaded Ukraine in February last year, EU member Finland abandoned its decades-long policy of military non-alignment. The country joined NATO in April.

Russia said at the time that it would take unspecified “countermeasures” in response.

Finland’s Border Guard has since tracked an uptick in undocumented arrivals, mostly from Africa and the Middle East.

Finland’s ombudsman for non-discrimination said on Thursday that Helsinki still had a duty under international treaties and EU law to allow asylum seekers to seek protection.

Finland is constructing a 200km (124-mile) fence on a section of the border, due to be completed by 2026.

Moscow begins shipments of 200,000 tonnes of grain months after it withdrew from UN-brokered Black Sea grain deal.

Russia’s agriculture minister says Moscow has begun free shipments of grain totalling up to 200,000 tonnes to six African countries, as promised by President Vladimir Putin.

In a statement posted on Telegram on Friday, Dmitry Patrushev said that ships headed for Burkina Faso and Somalia had already left Russian ports, and that additional shipments to Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Mali and Central African Republic would soon follow.

Putin had promised to deliver free grain to the six countries at a summit with African leaders in July, soon after Moscow withdrew from a deal that had allowed Ukraine to ship grain from its Black Sea ports despite the war with Russia.

The agreement, brokered by the United Nations and known as the Black Sea grain initiative, aimed to help avert famine by injecting more wheat, sunflower oil, fertiliser and other products into world markets, including for humanitarian needs.

After Russia announced its plan to send free shipments, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that a “handful of donations” would not correct the “dramatic impact” caused by the end of the Black Sea deal.

Since quitting the arrangement, Russia has repeatedly bombed Ukrainian ports and grain storage facilities, and Kyiv says hundreds of thousands of tonnes of cereals have been destroyed.

Alternative corridor

In response to the collapse of the deal, Ukraine announced a “humanitarian corridor” hugging the western Black Sea coast near Romania and Bulgaria.

On Friday, the Interfax-Ukraine news agency quoted a senior Ukrainian government official as saying that about 151 ships have used the new Black Sea shipping corridor since it was set up in August.

A total of 4.4 million metric tonnes of cargo, including 3.2 million tonnes of grain, has been shipped via the corridor, Yuriy Vaskov, deputy minister for renovation and infrastructure, was quoted as saying.

Vaskov said that 30 ships were being loaded at Ukrainian ports. They included 22 ships that would carry 700,000 tonnes of grain and eight ships readying 500,000 tonnes of other cargo.

Ukraine is one of the world’s leading grain producers and exporters. Keeping grain exports flowing is key for its economy, which shrank by about a third last year. It is expected to grow by about 5 percent this year.

The European Court of Human Rights is back in focus again as Prime Minister Rishi Sunak aims to push ahead with his plan to deport those who arrive in the UK illegally to Rwanda.

Mr Sunak is facing pressure from some of his own MPs to keep his flagship immigration policy alive after the UK’s Supreme Court ruled the scheme was unlawful.

The prime minister has said he will introduce emergency legislation to make sure his plan can go ahead, and acknowledging that the government could still face legal challenges from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), he vowed: “I will not allow a foreign court to block these flights.”

The government’s initial plan to fly illegal immigrants to Rwanda was blocked by the ECHR in June 2022 after issuing injunctions over the specifics of individual cases.

Sky News looks at how the ECHR works and why its decisions override those made in British courts.

Origins

The ECHR came into existence in the aftermath of the Second World War.

Even before the war had ended, in 1943, Winston Churchill had proposed a Council of Europe to ensure the continent would never again see the sort of injustices that allowed the Nazis to take over Germany and then impose fascism across the continent.

After the allied victory, the UK and 10 nations that had been involved in the war, plus Ireland, got together in 1949 to form the Council of Europe, a group tasked with upholding human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Europe.

One of its first tasks was to create a document that set out the rights people should enjoy in this new Europe – the European Convention of Human Rights.

But it needed to be upheld, so out of that came the European Court of Human Rights, a judicial body that would impose judgments on whether countries had breached a person’s rights.

It was and is central to the way the Council of Europe was set up that member countries have to abide by the convention, and hence the rulings of the court.

The Council of Europe has since grown and now contains 46 states, including many not in the European Union.

The only European countries not in the council – and therefore not subject to the rulings of the ECHR – are Russia, Belarus and the Vatican City, although the Holy See as the Vatican is also known is an “observer state”, which means it can be invited to take part in discussions.

Russia was a member for 26 years but was ejected in March after the invasion of Ukraine.

If the UK doesn’t like the court’s decisions, can’t it just leave?

Suella Braverman – who was sacked as home secretary on Monday – has echoed calls from other Tory MPs as she said the UK must leave the ECHR order to revive the Rwanda scheme.

So far, since it was set up, only one country other than Russia has left the Council of Europe – and hence become no longer subject to the ECHR – and that was Greece in 1969.

At the time, Greece had undergone a military coup and had abolished democracy. This brought it into conflict with the principles of the Council. Greece was at risk of being thrown out if it hadn’t withdrawn.

The UK is within its rights to withdraw in theory, and to do so all it would have to do is notify the secretary general. It would then have to wait until the next financial year to leave.

But the UK is signed up to the Good Friday Agreement, which requires it under international law to implement the European Convention on Human Rights in Northern Ireland.

It would also be a seismic event – for a country which founded a human rights body like the Council to leave it just because of a court ruling against it.

What’s in the convention?

Along with the breaches of human rights that happened during the Second World War, the brutality meted out in the communist east also played a part in shaping the convention, especially as more members joined the Council of Europe.

The convention was based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which had been adopted by the nascent United Nations in 1948.

At its heart was securing the principle of democracy, with all the rights it enshrined – many from British and French traditions – aimed at ensuring a democratic state could function effectively.

It consists of 18 articles and 15 protocols that provide protection for people against the unfair and unjust actions of the state, or potentially other individuals through the state.

The articles are the fundamental rights that member states must provide. The protocols were added later, some of which became compulsory and others encouraged.

The articles include the right to: life, liberty, security, fair trial, privacy, free expression, assembly and protection from torture and servitude.

Among the protocols are: protection for property; the right to education; the right to take part in free, secret elections; the right to move freely; the right not to be discriminated against; and the restriction and abolition of the death penalty.

The UK has not ratified protocol 4, which provides the right to move freely and to leave a country, prohibits the expulsion of nationals, provides the right to enter a country and prohibits the collective expulsion of foreigners. This is because of concerns it affects British nationality law regarding the rights of British Nationals (Overseas) to live in the UK.

How does the court operate?

Sitting in Strasbourg, the court has 46 judges – one for each of the nations in the Council of Europe – each of whom serves for a nine-year term.

The British judge is Tim Eicke, a German-born QC and expert on international human rights law.

Cases registered are assigned to a figure called a judge rapporteur, who decides whether cases are admissible, depending on whether they abide by a list of criteria.

Generally, most cases will be heard by a chamber of seven judges, unless the case raises serious questions of interpretation of the ECHR, which means it will be heard by the Grand Chamber of 17 judges.

Once a judgment has been made, it is passed to a group called the Committee of Ministers, made up of the foreign ministers of each member state, who are expected to implement the decision.

The court has no power to force a change in laws set by a country’s parliament – the Committee of Ministers oversees the process by which member states change their laws, but it cannot be enforced.

Consequently, there have been numerous instances of countries not abiding by decisions, or the legal implications of decisions.

In 2015, while still a member of the Council of Europe, Russia adopted a law allowing it to overrule judgments from the ECHR.

Other countries’ courts have at times queried the applicability of ECHR decisions in national settings.

Issues with the court

Over the years, the UK government has had many run-ins with the court, as people have tested the application of British law and how it interacts with the convention.

It has led to British law being reshaped, with judgments being integrated into case law in the respective parts of the UK.

British politicians have regularly been critical of ECHR decisions but England and the devolved nations generally abide by them.

One the government refused to implement, however, was the rights of prisoners to vote, which in 2005 the court said should apply to the UK. A form of compromise was reached in 2017, when those out on temporary licence were provided with voting rights.

Another issue has been that, with the expansion of the Council of Europe, the number of cases registered with the court has grown exponentially.

As of 31 December 2021, there were 70,150 live applications pending to be allocated, but 24% of those were from Russia.

Since the court was formed, it has delivered judgments on 24,511 cases (up to the end of 2021) and in 2021 it made 1,005 judgments on just over 3,000 applications. Until 1995, it had only issued 895 judgments since the foundation of the court.

On last year’s judgments, almost half concerned Russia, Ukraine and Romania, with a total of 84% of decisions going against member states.

The number of cases being lodged led the UK to propose a further protocol (number 15) to the convention, aimed at reforming the ability of the court to manage the number of applications. It was adopted last year.

The ECHR and the European Court of Justice

Much of the confusion concerning the ECHR comes from the existence and rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The difference is that the ECJ only applies in the European Union. It is effectively the supreme court of the EU and is responsible for ruling on matters of EU law, which includes the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU).

The two overlap heavily but the CFREU has extra rights that only apply in EU countries and one of these is the right to asylum.

Unlike with the ECHR, however, it is not possible for individuals to appeal to the ECJ over possible breaches of the CFREU as part of EU law.

As might be expected, as every EU state is also signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, the ECHR is regarded as a minimum standard by which all EU member states must operate.

No country has ever become a member of the EU without having been first member of the Council of Europe.

The murderer of Irish teacher Ashling Murphy “should never see the light of day again”, her mother has said as he was sentenced to life.

Jozef Puska, 33, of Mucklagh, Tullamore, was found guilty last week following a trial, where the jury was told by the judge “we have evil in this room”.

At Dublin’s Central Criminal Court on Friday, Mr Justice Tony Hunt said there was only one sentence available, and it was “deserved”.

He said Puska’s evidence had been “indescribable” and the “one thing we don’t know about this case is the why”.

Ms Murphy, 23, was killed while she was out exercising along a canal in Tullamore, County Offaly, in January last year.

She was wearing a Fitbit which showed her exercise started at 2.51pm. But 30 minutes later it tracked “erratic, violent movements”. At 3.31pm, the Fitbit was no longer recording any heartbeat.

Ms Murphy’s mother said her “heart was ripped” from her body the moment she learned her daughter had been killed.

In a victim impact statement read out in court by a detective garda, Mrs Murphy said her “heart broke the moment I heard the bad news Ashling was murdered”.

“There is such a void in our home,” she said.

She said that the actions of Puska “must have consequences” and said “he should never see the light of day again”.

She said before her daughter left the house, she had begged her not to go along the canal, to which Ms Murphy replied “Ah mum, I’m 23 years old” before giving her mother a hug.

She gave her “a big hug and said ‘I love you, you’re the best mum in the world’ and walked out the door”, the court heard.

Ms Murphy’s partner said their relationship was “full with love, trust respect” and “was quite simply heaven on earth”.

Describing how they had first met as teenagers, Ryan Casey said they had plans to travel together, to build a house, start a family, and get married.

He said it did not make sense to him that someone who is “a burden to society can completely and permanently destroy someone… who is the complete opposite”, describing Ms Murphy as “a light with dreams, compassion, respect, a person who contributes to society in the best way possible”.

Read more:
Ashling Murphy and Ireland’s femicide epidemic

Mr Murphy’s death drew outrage across Ireland and the UK, prompting calls for more to be done about femicide.

During the trial, the court heard a man was seen in a ditch with a woman, believed to be Ms Murphy, and he shouted for a witness to go away.

They said Ms Murphy appeared to be fighting back, but not making any noise.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Shane MacGowan’s wife has posted an update on The Pogues singer’s health.

She had previously thanked well-wishers when posting a photo of the Fairytale Of New York singer in a hospital bed earlier this week.

MacGowan, 65, is believed to have been in intensive care for the past few months after he was diagnosed with viral encephalitis last year.

It is a serious condition where the brain becomes inflamed. It can be life-threatening and requires urgent treatment in hospital.

On Friday, his wife, Irish journalist Victoria Mary Clarke, said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, that he was “feeling much better”.

She also said she was “so grateful to everyone who is willing him to get home for Christmas”.

Ms Clarke, 57, said in an Instagram post on Saturday that she was “facing terrifying fears of loss”.

She wrote: “Love is the most beautiful and powerful thing that we can experience as humans but love can also feel painful especially if you are afraid of losing a person or anything else that you love.”

“Sometimes when you love very deeply you will find yourself facing terrifying fears of loss that can feel so big and devastating that you don’t know how you can survive them and you can’t imagine life without this person that you love,” she added.

The couple married in 2018 at Copenhagen City Hall in Denmark after more than 32 years together.

Ms Clarke previously revealed MacGowan’s bandmates Spider Stacy and Terry Woods had visited him recently.

The singer has faced several health issues in recent years.

In 2015, MacGowan broke his pelvis and has used a wheelchair since.

Six years later, he broke his knee in a fall before tearing ligaments in his left leg.

He never fully recovered from his injuries and confirmed in April that he “can’t walk anymore”.

MacGowan has also been open about his battle with addiction.

In 2015, he received a full set of teeth implants as his real teeth were destroyed by decades of drinking and drug use.